1. Once reception of the text has been confirmed, the work will be submitted to a process of pre-selection by the editors of the journal so as to determine its thematic suitability. Once the work has been rated as relevant for publication it will be submitted for anonymous peer review; in the case of research articles, documentary analysis, and studies of works of art, opinions will be sought from two specialists in the field; biographical sketches and reviews will be submitted to a single referee.

2. Referees shall be external to the journal’s editorial team and shall have no relationship with the author. They must have studies of master’s or doctorate level and have published at least one article of research, reflection or critical review related to the subject of the manuscript. They will be provided with an assessment form with which to express their opinion on the quality of the originals received.

3. Whatever the nature of the results, the contents of referees’ opinions will be delivered to the                     authors. At all times the anonymity of both authors and evaluators will be respected.

4. The editors of the journal shall be empowered to request modifications to—or to reject­­—the         contribution in attendance upon referees’ determinations. Decisions may take the form: a) accepted without changes; b) accepted with suggestions for changes; c) accepted on the condition of carrying out the changes indicated; or d) rejected.